律师本色（1997）

The Practice S06E01

Part 9 Feb. 3, 2021, 1:15 p.m.

the Commonwealth will only be asking you
检方只会请你们关注这些显而易见的事实。
to see the obvious.
检方只会请你们关注这些显而易见的事实。
The defendant murdered the man
被告杀了这个和她太太做♥爱♥的男人。
sleeping with his wife.
被告杀了这个和她太太做♥爱♥的男人。
I agree with the district attorney.
我同意地区检察官的说法，
This trial is simply
这次庭审仅是针对Ellison为什么会在家中
about why Senator Ellison
这次庭审仅是针对Ellison为什么会在家中
fatally wounded the stranger in his house.
使一个陌生人受到了致命伤。
To answer that question,
为了回答这个问题，
you'll need to get into the head
你们要设身处地地替Ellison参议员想一下。
of Senator Ellison.
你们要设身处地地替Ellison参议员想一下。
You'll need to imagine
你们需要想象自己晚上回到家
coming home late at night
你们需要想象自己晚上回到家
and hearing the sounds of a struggle
听到了从你卧室传来搏斗的声响。
coming from your bedroom.
听到了从你卧室传来搏斗的声响。
You will need to fathom the panic,
当你知道你的爱人今晚独自在家时，
knowing your spouse
当你知道你的爱人今晚独自在家时，
was home alone this night.
你们需要体会这种恐慌，
You will have to appreciate the fear
你们要体会到这种会突然吞噬掉你的恐惧，
that can suddenly consume you
你们要体会到这种会突然吞噬掉你的恐惧，
at the thought--
当你想到。。。
the thought that the person you love
想到你爱的人在隔壁房♥间被强♥奸♥或者被杀害
is being raped
想到你爱的人在隔壁房♥间被强♥奸♥或者被杀害
or possibly killed
想到你爱的人在隔壁房♥间被强♥奸♥或者被杀害
in the next room.
想到你爱的人在隔壁房♥间被强♥奸♥或者被杀害
Can any of us truly presume
我们中有人能真正地推断出来那会是什么情况吗？
to know what that must be like?
我们中有人能真正地推断出来那会是什么情况吗？
Have any of us ever had to listen
我们中有人曾经听到过自己的丈夫或者妻子
to the sounds of a husband
我们中有人曾经听到过自己的丈夫或者妻子
or wife being attacked
遭到一个不速之客攻击时发出的声音吗？
by an intruder?
遭到一个不速之客攻击时发出的声音吗？
The evidence will show
证据会表明在当晚所发生的是
what happened that night
证据会表明在当晚所发生的是
is that Senator Ellison went racing
Ellison参议员冲进那间屋子去保护他所钟爱的女人
into that room
去保护他所钟爱的女人，
to protect the woman he loved,
去保护他所钟爱的女人，
the mother of his daughter,
他女儿Allison的妈妈，
Allison.
他女儿Allison的妈妈，
He charged in there with a gun
他拿着枪冲进去的时候，
in a state of panic,
他处于惊慌、担忧和恐惧的状态下，
fear, horror
他处于惊慌、担忧和恐惧的状态下，
to see an intruder
看到一个不速之客压在他太太的身上。
on top of his wife,
看到一个不速之客压在他太太的身上。
and he fired.
于是他开了枪。
Turns out,
结果呢，
he got it wrong.
他搞错了，
It was mistaken self-defense.
这是个错误的正当防卫。
That will be the evidence
这是明摆着的，
because it's the truth,
因为这本来就是事实，
and as you listen to the facts,
当你们听取事实经过，听取证人的证词时，
the testimony,
当你们听取事实经过，听取证人的证词时，
the witnesses,
当你们听取事实经过，听取证人的证词时，
remember, the prosecution's entire case,
请记住，检方的全部立案依据，
all of it,
所有的依据，
the reason we are even here,
也就是为什么我们会在这里的原因，
is their presumption
仅是他们假定自己
they know what was going on
了解Ellison参议员脑子里想的是什么。
in Senator Ellison's mind.
了解Ellison参议员脑子里想的是什么。
Of course, that's impossible,
当然，那是不可能的，
impossible for them to know,
他们不可能了解，
impossible for you to know.
你们也一样。
All the Commonwealth can really do
检方真正能做的只是要你们去想象。
is ask you to imagine.
检方真正能做的只是要你们去想象。
And we will be making
而我们要提出的也是完全一样的要求。
that very same request.
而我们要提出的也是完全一样的要求。
Imagine.
想象。
That's how he looked when we got there.
我们到那儿的时候他就是这个样子。
Who else was there when you arrived, detective?
警探，你到的时候还有谁？
The defendant, Mrs. Ellison,
被告和Ellison太太，
the daughter, Allison,
他们的女儿，Allison，
and the defendant's attorney, Ms. Frutt.
还有被告的律师Frutt女士
The attorney was there before the police?
律师比警♥察♥早到了吗？
That's correct.
没错。
Who called the police?
谁报的警？
Ms. Frutt.
Was there ever a 911 call placed
有从住♥宅♥里打出的911报♥警♥电♥话♥吗？
from the residence?
有从住♥宅♥里打出的911报♥警♥电♥话♥吗？
No, there was not.
没有。
After you finally got there,
在你到达现场后，
at some point you decided
在某个时刻你决定将被告以涉嫌谋杀进行逮捕。
to place the defendant
在某个时刻你决定将被告以涉嫌谋杀进行逮捕。
under arrest for murder.
在某个时刻你决定将被告以涉嫌谋杀进行逮捕。
Yes. Why?
-是的
-为什么？
There was a single gunshot wound to the head
只有在相当近的距离击中头部的枪伤，
from a fairly close range,
只有在相当近的距离击中头部的枪伤，
resembling an execution-style-- Objection.
-类似于一种处决的方式。。。
-反对
Sustained.
反对有效。
The gun was found on the scene.
在现场找到了抢。
It belonged to the defendant.
是属于被告的。
Did you check it for fingerprints?
你查验过指纹吗？
It had been wiped clean of any fingerprints.
所有指纹都被擦掉了。
Did you subsequently do any tests
你后来针对被告做过什么测试以确定他是否拿过枪吗？
on the defendant to determine
你后来针对被告做过什么测试以确定他是否拿过抢吗？
if he had held the gun?
你后来针对被告做过什么测试以确定他是否拿过枪吗？
Yes We did what is known as a trace metal test,
是的，我们做的是微量金属测试，
which basically indicates whether or not a person
这种测试主要是表明一个人最近是否持过枪。
has recently held a firearm.
这种测试主要是表明一个人最近是否持过枪。
And what were the results of this test?
测试结果呢？
They were negative.
结果是阴性，他没有持过枪。
Well, now I'm confused
那，我现在有点糊涂了，
because the defendant subsequently admitted
因为被告后来承认他拿着枪开枪了呀。
that he had held and fired the gun.
因为被告后来承认他拿着枪开枪了呀。
We believe that he either wiped the residue off
我们认为他要么是把残留物擦掉了
or he was wearing gloves.
要么就是他戴了手套。
So before he ran to get the gun,
那就是说在他跑去拿枪前，
he first ran to go put on a pair of gloves.
他先跑去找了一副手套戴上。
Objection--speculation.
反对。。。引导证人进行猜测。
Overruled.
反对无效。
He can state his opinion.
他可以陈述他的意见。
We think he was going to hide his I. D.
我们认为他是想掩盖他枪手的身份，
as the shooter,
我们认为他是想掩盖他枪手的身份，
then changed his mind
之后他改了主意，转为提出正当防卫。
and went to self-defense.
之后他改了主意，转为提出正当防卫。
When you arrived, detective,
警探先生，当你到达现场的时候，
how was the defendant dressed?
被告衣着如何？
He was showered,
他洗过澡了，
wearing freshly laundered clothes.
穿着新洗过的衣服。
The clothes he had previously been seen in
他之前被看到穿过的衣服在洗衣机里。
were in the washing machine.
他之前被看到穿过的衣服在洗衣机里。
The washing machine,
你到现场的时候，那台洗衣机正在运转吗？
was that on when you arrived?
你到现场的时候，那台洗衣机正在运转吗？
No, but judging from the heat
不，但根据洗衣机表面的温度，
on the surface of the machine,
不，但根据洗衣机表面的温度，
we determined that it had been on
我们确定这台洗衣机在之前的40分钟内使用过。
within the previous 40 minutes.
我们确定这台洗衣机在之前的40分钟内使用过。
So after the shooting,
那就是说枪击后，
the defendant did a load of laundry.
被告洗了一大堆衣服。
Seems so.
看来是的。
After a shooting at this range,
在这个距离内♥射♥击后，
it's likely there would be some blood splattered